As it has been reported, there may not be any games played in the 2011-2012 NFL season. An NFL work stoppage would cause enormous financial losses for many entities, and would affect not only the NFL players, who will lose their pay and health benefits, but the owners, television stations, fans, cities and states, and the country as a whole. The NFL is a $9 billion a year enterprise (topping MLB’s $7 billion, the NBA’s $4 billion, and the NHL’s $3 billion) and its tentacles reach far into the pockets of various industries within the United States.
For the past two years, NFL owners and the National Football League Players Association (NFLPA) have been at odds over labor disputes. Disputes such as revenue sharing, team salary caps, rookie salaries, and the extension of the NFL regular season to 18 games have made the most successful sporting industry in the world seem so fragile.
Since 2006, labor negotiations have been a constant since the owners made the mistake of signing a bad Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA). The 2006 deal failed to address the exorbitant compensation of rookies, and as a result the NFL owners have seen their cash flow decline by a staggering $200 million. The deal raised players’ pay more than was healthy for the league, and left owners with insufficient cash to invest in their product. For example, the owners don’t have enough capital to invest in new stadiums. Although the New York Jets/Giants and the Dallas Cowboys have new stadiums, which were under construction prior to the 2006 season, no new stadiums have been constructed in the past four years.
In 2009, NFL clubs contracted a record $1.2 billion to 256 drafted rookies with approximately $585 million guaranteed before they even stepped on an NFL field. This brings to mind contracts like the one given to JaMarcus Russell, the quarterback drafted first overall by the Oakland Raiders in 2007, in which he was guaranteed $31 million. And after three disappointing years he was no longer playing in the NFL. Unlike the National Basketball Association (NBA), the NFL doesn’t have a salary cap for its rookies. This issue, along with many others, has brought the NFL to its knees. However, many of the problems that the NFL is currently experiencing are not new. Off and on since 1982, when the NFL had its first strike, these problems have been lingering.
The 1982 NFL strike began on September 21, 1982 and lasted 57 days until November 16, 1982. The essential cause of the strike was over a dispute over the percentage of gross revenues that the league gave to its players, as is the problem today. And in 1987 there was another strike which led to the NFL hastily assembling replacement teams, who employed replacement players for a handy $1,000 per game. That year, 89 players crossed the picket line including players such as New York Jets defensive end Mark Gastineau, Dallas Cowboys defensive tackle Randy White, San Francisco 49ers quarterback Joe Montana, and Seahawks wide receiver Steve Largent.
For the next decade the NFL and its owners found themselves in a number of court proceedings that eventually led to a new CBA being reached in 1993. This 1993 CBA was extended five times over the next 13 years, most recently in March 2006 when it was extended through the 2011-2012 NFL season. However, in May 2008 the owners decided to opt out of this agreement and play the 2010-11 season without a CBA in place. This meant that the 2010-11 season would be played without a team salary cap. Unlike Major League Baseball (MLB), the NFL has a team salary cap. Introduced in 1994, the salary cap places a limit on the amount of money a team can spend on player salaries. Without a cap, teams like the New York Yankees of big league baseball have become head and shoulders above the rest of league, and parity has becomes non-existent. The NFL has prided itself on parity. In the NFL, any team can go from worst to first in just one year.
In 1994, the NFL salary cap was a mere $34.6 million, and by 2009 it had risen to an astounding $128 million per team, an increase of 300% over a 15 year period.
Another issue that is plaguing the NFL is the dispute over revenue sharing. The T.V. networks pay the NFL nearly $400 million a year in licensing rights (the T.V money is guaranteed regardless if football is played or not), which is shared evenly to its 32 teams. As it stands, NFL players get 60% of this revenue, and the owners would like for this number to decrease. If you talk to the owners, they want the players to take a 9% pay cut, and if you talk to the players, the owners want them to take an 18% pay cut. This, in a nutshell, is the core problem that is preventing the NFL from reaching a new CBA.
If a new deal isn’t reached by March 3, 2011, the work stoppage will begin. The NFL stands to lose $400 million in March alone, and could lose as much as $1 billion by August.
I know that the pioneers of the league such as Pete Rozelle, commissioner of the NFL from 1960-1989, and Gene Upshaw, Executive Director of the NFLPA from 1983-2008, are rolling over in their graves.
In my opinion, this situation is like corporate America trying to stick it to the “middle class.” For instance, when corporate America needed money to maintain their businesses, they demanded a bail-out and expected the tax payers to pay for it. Likewise, in this case, the owners are in need of a bail-out and they are expecting the players to pay for it via substantial pay cuts. It’s ridiculous enough that a 30-second Super Bowl commercial will cost advertisers nearly $3 million, that’s $100,000 per-second. In addition to this, the league’s desire to extend the NFL season to an 18-game season, by shortening the pre-season to two games, could generate $500 million in additional revenue.
And you mean to tell me that there’s not enough money to go around?
The situation is so bad that the NFLPA has issued a memo to all players not to buy a new boat, or a new car, and to pay off all outstanding debt as soon as possible. This is a real indication that we may not have any football in 2011. However, the 2011 NFL Draft will take place from April 28-30, but teams are not permitted to sign any players until a new CBA has been completed. And they can’t sign undrafted players either.
In closing, I believe that the players make the league, and without them you have nothing. The players are the ones who put their lives on the line every week, and for that they should be given more than a fair share of the revenues. I think that the owners are being greedy, and their greed will ultimately ruin the NFL. The owners signed the 2006 CBA; therefore they should adhere to that agreement, just as they expect their players to adhere to the contracts that they sign. Recently, the NFLPA have taken their grievances to a new playing field, Capitol Hill.
To all NFL owners, think about the players’ families, and the fans, and the country and settle this dispute immediately. Adhere to what was agreed upon in 2006, which was to play football through 2011, and give everyone involved an additional 12 months to negotiate a new deal. Be the bigger person, and set the example for your employees.






Good article, Argin. I was a little confused about what would happen if a new CBA was not in place by March and you answered most of the questions I had. I also understand that teams can’t sign current free agents after the stoppage. Can they be signed before March 3th?
Comment by Lloyd — January 21, 2011 @ 3:23 pm
@Lloyd….no, I believe its June 1st before any free agents can be signed.
Comment by Argin — January 21, 2011 @ 9:42 pm
@Lloyd…and Thank You!!!
Comment by Argin — January 21, 2011 @ 9:53 pm
Good article. You did your research and know your facts. Keep up the good work.
Comment by NICOLE — January 21, 2011 @ 11:11 pm
I don’t really disagree with the article except to say that both the players and the owners on the whole are too greedy and if something isn’t done it could lead to big problems if not now then sooner rather than later. There does need to be a Rookie Salary Cap it makes no since to me that someone who has never taken an NFL snap can make more money than a 10 year veteran who has put their body on the line game in and game out. I love this sport but team caps are what makes it so great. The player’s and the owners both need to realize that they need each other to make this game work. Its true the player’s are the ones who put their bodies on the line but if the owners didn’t have the money to put teams in cities the football players won’t have a job. They need to come to an agreement that is more middle of the road and fair for all sides but as long as greed is so prevalent in our culture and it stays a world of a “ME” first philosophy this will never happen. Here is to hoping we have football to enjoy next season.
Comment by Brian — January 22, 2011 @ 2:14 am
I hate to be the bearer of bad news but this thing is a mess. There is a better chance of no football next year than most people think.
Comment by bricarr2 — January 22, 2011 @ 11:12 am
Very informative, thank you. I have to disagree with you on one thing though. I think the fans make the league. No fans–no league. Players can be replaced. A 300% pay increase in 15 years is unbelieveable and probably higher than any other industry. Players make way too much and the fans are the ones who pay in the end. Owners need fans in the stands to make money. Salaries drive up the cost of seats that determine if the stands are full or not. While players salaries have increased %300 over the past 15 years, their fan’s salaries have probably increased 3-5% a year in that same period. And the owners aren’t making that much more than they were 15 years ago. If the owners were making 300% more than they were 15 years ago, then I would be mad at them. I am for a salary cap on rookies. Pay them a set salary for two years based on their order drafted, then let them make what they can after that. With all that said, I want my football. Not only would there be a financial impact on the nation, there would be a psychological impact too.
Comment by Jeff in VA — January 22, 2011 @ 11:55 am
Psychological impact is right! LOL! And YES, WE NEED A SALARY CAP FOR ROOKIES!!!
Comment by Argin — January 22, 2011 @ 2:08 pm
I agree with a salary cap for rookies too. If they pan out as good players (like Berry) then they get their great contract after their first 2 years.
Comment by Lloyd — January 23, 2011 @ 11:08 am
the owners just need to give up and pay the players so we can have football
Comment by michael diedrich — January 25, 2011 @ 1:52 am
Unfortunately this has all to do with greed, as with every other issue we have in America right now. There is more than enough money to go around, but both sides have placed their respective stakes in the ground and cooler heads WILL NOT PREVAIL. Not until they call each other truly rotten names and somebody says something really stupid.
One side is going to have to win, and the other is going to have to lose. For some stupid reason they won’t compromise, and for I can’t and don’t want to figure that out. It must be about ego.
It’s millionaire arguing with billionaires… Wake me when something real happens, like life…
Comment by Jeff — January 27, 2011 @ 4:03 pm